Lorayne Pardo's camp is discontented with the Reckless Imprudence Resulting in Homicide case filed by the Cavite prosecutor's office against actor Richard Gutierrez last September 18 because it may allow the actor to "not serve sentence in jail."
According to Atty. Firdausi I.Y. Abbas, Lorayne's lead counsel, the case filed by the provincial prosecutors lacks the qualifying circumstance that constitutes Richard's "neglect" of his deceased personal assistant, Nomar Pardo, after the accident.
Atty. Abbas spoke in a presscon he headed this morning, Sept. 24, at the Abbas Law Firm in Greenhills, San Juan. Also present were Atty. Ombra Jainal, Lorayne, and Nomar's father Ramon Pardo, who previously told PEP (Philippine Entertainment Portal) that the Cavite resolution was "good."
Atty. Abbas said, "Sinampa na yung complaint na Reckless Imprudence Resulting in Homicide. Pero hindi kami kuntento dun sa resolution ng fiscal. Kasi yung qualifying circumstance na nilagay namin doon na si Richard did not extend immediate assistance to the victim [Nomar Pardo] as mandated under the law, e, hindi in-appreciate ng mga fiscal dahil iba yung kanilang katwiran."
Atty. Abbas added that if the prosecutors appreciated the qualifying circumstance into the case, Richard may serve a longer jail sentence than the maximum penalty of six years in Reckless Imprudence Resulting in Homicide cases. With the six year penalty, he can also apply for probation.
"Now if it is qualified... it [penalty] would be graduated to prision correccional in its maximum period to prision mayor to its minimum period, which means four years and two months and one day, to eight years instead of just six years," he said.
According to the Probation Law of 1976, or Presidential Decree 968, convicted offenders sentenced to more than six years in prison shall be disqualified for probation (serving sentence outside prison).
One of the three conditions for the court to grant probation is if the convicted offender can prove that there is "undue risk that during the period of probation the offender will commit another crime."
Article 365 of the Revised Penal Code states that a person who causes the death of a person due to imprudence and negligence in a vehicular accident shall be penalized with a maximum jail time of six years. It adds, "The penalty next higher in degree to those provided for in this article shall be imposed upon the offender who fails to lend on the spot to the injured parties such help as may be in this hand to give."
FINDING NOMAR. PEP (Philippine Entertainment Portal) previously published detailed reports that Richard Gutierrez's sportscar hit one PLDT post and three coconut trees while driving on the Sta. Rosa-Tagaytay Road at about 1:30a.m. of May 22. The actor immediately went out of his car to look for his personal assistant. Nomar Pardo had been thrown out of the car, landing 10 meters away. Since it was still dark, Richard was not able to find Nomar. Richard was rushed to the hospital minutes later.
In Richard's counter-affidavit, affirmed in Cavite last Sept. 4, he stated that he "initially refused" to be brought to the hospital because they still "have not found Nomar" at that point, but he was "prodded to do so."
On the other hand, Lorayne said in her Reply-Affidavit filed on Sept. 4, that the actor "failed to immediately render assistance" to her husband because he "neglected" him.
In the four-page resolution, however, prosecutors Larry Cabero, Alexander Eric Leveriza, Rosa Elmina Villarin, and Provincial Chief Prosecutor Emmanuel Velasco said Richard's action to leave the accident site to seek medical attention "could not be taken against him."
The resolution read, "It is hardly believable that anyone inside the vehicle could have survived. Thus, assuming for the sake of argument that respondent immediately proceeded to the nearest hospital for medical attention, such act could not be taken against him [Richard]. Human experience has time and again demonstrated that instinct to survive is paramount."
THREE CIRCUMSTANCES. Atty. Abbas insisted, however, that the prosecutors should have appreciated Richard's action into the case.






Kung yong ginastos ba naman ni RG nong magtapos ang Zorrrot ay ibinigay na lang sa napag-usapan nila noon ni RG at AR ay natapos na sana ang problema ni RG.
kaya lang di talaga nila tanggapin na may kasalanan si RG sa aksidente. Ang gusto pa yata nila mangyari ay kay Lorayne sila hihingi ng pera.
baka naman the incarceration of richard is the least of their concern. gagawin lang talaga nilang leverage itong criminal case para mapilitang mag shell-out ng bigger amount of money ang mga gutierrezes.
in any case, kapag sakaling maconvict si richard, even if hindi mag serve ng sentence in jail si richard dahil probationable ang kaso niya, yung conviction nya lang would be enough form of justice already.
pag ginamit nya ang probation kung sakali, next time na magka criminal case siya at ma convict, hindi na niya pwede gamitin ang probation
also, pag nag apply siya for probation hindi nya pwede i appeal ang kaso nya. it is already an admission na tama yung verdict against him.
of course, this scenario would play out only kung mahatulan siyang guilty ng court. hindi pa naman kasi 100 sure na aabot sa ganun dahil marami pa ang pwedeng mangyari from now until the time na magrender na ng decision ang
Now that you have mentioned that lalo lang sumakit ang ulo ko. The pronouncements na ginawa ng prosecutor had too much emphasis about his not leaving the scene kesyo instict daw for survival, etc etc. All the more - I can smell the master plan they had.
Sana nga the lawyers of the Pardos will insist that ayusin ng prosecutor yung complaint. The photos of RG days after the accident appear na puro superficial wounds lang ang natama niya.If they claim that other medical procedures were performed they should provide proof and examine the proof.
pwede pa naman iwithdraw yung complaint para ayusin ng prosecutor for as long as hindi pa na aarraign si richard, kung magrereklamo sa prosecutor's office sina lorayne. mag motion dapat siya.
I am sure the prosecutor and his team are professionals in their field. Why was it not possible for them to ensure that their findings and submissions were more comprehensive?Was it too hard? Would have they submitted the same quality of reporting to the court if the incident involved someone powerful and moneyed in society?
Emmanuel Velasco - your father's name is also at stake. Do something that he may be proud of. It is not too late for you to rectify the deficiencies of your work.
sana naman may mga abogado pa ngayong di masisilaw sa pera.....
ayaw ni monsterbel na makulong si retsard....paano mawalan na siya ng datung kung makulong anak nya